Skip to main content
See details

Reimbursement summary for angioplasty of arteries of lower extremities

This post presents an extract from our reimbursement analysis for angioplasty of arteries lower extremities using plain and drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for peripheral artery disease in England, France and Germany. Plain balloon angioplasty is reimbursement via DRG solely and DCBs are reimbursement via combination of DRG and add-on reimbursement.
See details

Out-patient lump-sum payment packages suggested to the Swiss Federal Council

In June 2020, santésuisse (the leading organization of Swiss health insurers) and the Swiss Society of Surgeons (FCMH) have submitted a proposal to the Federal Council for the acceptance of 67 lump-sum payment packages for out-patient services. The lump-sum payment packages concern the following areas of care: hand surgery, radiology (MRI / CT), pediatric surgery, vascular medicine, eye surgery, and anesthesia.

The commonly acknowledged issue with the current reimbursement system is ineffective and unnecessary spending. Certain stakeholders of the out-patient reimbursement system proposed certain measures to increase the efficiency of spending. The following reasons set the basis for the rationale behind this action:

  • The same treatment will always cost the same, based on the national tariff structure with a uniform cost model
  • Eliminating the incentive of the care providers to bill unnecessary services (as TARMED / TARDOC are the fee-for-service catalogs)
  • The set price is only paid if the corresponding quality standards are also met, as the care providers and hospitals who join (optional) the collective agreement for out-patient lump-sum payment packages must participate in a recognized quality program

In July 2020, eight more lump-sum payment packages were suggested to the Federal Council. More suggestions are expected in the near future.

However, according to the director of curafutura (another health insurers’ association), “these lump-sums will cover only less than 20% of out-patient services.  Furthermore, this framework is optional. The lump-sums are not opposed to TARDOC, but represent a complement, as the two systems can coexist. In many areas of out-patient care, the lump sum will hardly be a viable alternative. In many cases, billing for individual services (fee-for-service) is more appropriate; the lump-sums are not always a better way to contain health care costs.” (reference)

Read the original announcement in German (change to French or Italian in the top-right corner) here.

Subscribe to our newsletter delivered every second week not to miss important reimbursement information.